“Rumors and Rumblings” is a new weekly feature that runs each Wednesday (a day late this week). It includes short nuggets of information that we glean from conversations throughout the week. Enjoy.
1. Where is Chief Justice Chuck Malone going to land? Some are saying they expect him to end up in Tommy Bryan’s seat on the Court of Civil Appeals. Another possibility could involve a game of judicial musical chairs with Tuscaloosa judge Scott Donaldson landing in Tommy Bryan’s seat and Malone heading back home to Tuscaloosa to replace Donaldson. The most interesting (although unlikely) scenario we’ve heard is that he could end up as head of the two-year college system.
2. Speaker Hubbard’s new book, “Storming the State House” is gearing up for an early June release. A big media push is in the works and proceeds from the book will be going to John Croyl’s Big Oak Ranch. Speculation revolves around who will be happy/mad/sad/surprised with how their role in campaign 2010 is portrayed in the book.
3. A Montgomery-based lobbying firm has found themselves in the crosshairs of various business associations for funneling large amounts of trial lawyer money to Charlie Graddick’s Chief Justice campaign. Working that closely with the trial lawyers has sparked concern (and outrage in some cases) with the firm’s decision which places them on the opposite side of their business clients. This story is developing.
1) Chuck Malone will do well wherever he goes. He has served well as Chief Justice. As far as Bentley hurting Malone, consider that Chuck Malone was virtually unknown outside Tuscaloosa County and he did well–running even with a well-known Charlie Graddick.
2)Sounds good for John Croyle’s ministry
3) Charlie Graddick is an independent man. I supported Malone, but always respected Charlie as his own man. His getting trial lawyer money, when he also received business money, demonstrates that both sides were comfortable with Charlie.
For the record, I also appreciate and now support Judge Roy Moore. We really had three good guys in that race
Sounds like ALFA’s boohooing and blaming everyone else for Malone’s loss. Truth is, if anyone should be blamed, it should be Bentley, not the trial lawyers. I do find it interesting though that Graddick and Malone fought over the business vote and all the while Graddick was getting back-door money from the trial lawyers. Well played Charlie.
I’m just not sure how that flew under the radar if Malone’s campaign staff was worth their salt………….
Malone’s crazy if he takes the 2 year college system job. That’s just a bunch of headaches for nothing when he could go back to the bench.
As for the Millers. Not surprised. I’m just surprised it didn’t become a campaign issue. Malone’s campaign should have been watching the money trial a little closer.
@ Cliff ok, I have several names for diff appointment so it will be interesting to see who this maybe.
1) Chuck Malone will do well wherever he goes. He has served well as Chief Justice. As far as Bentley hurting Malone, consider that Chuck Malone was virtually unknown outside Tuscaloosa County and he did well–running even with a well-known Charlie Graddick.
2)Sounds good for John Croyle’s ministry
3) Charlie Graddick is an independent man. I supported Malone, but always respected Charlie as his own man. His getting trial lawyer money, when he also received business money, demonstrates that both sides were comfortable with Charlie.
For the record, I also appreciate and now support Judge Roy Moore. We really had three good guys in that race
Bye BYE Chuck! haha He also said that a state rep was leaving to get appoint last week…what happened there?
“Near future”…not sure how fast it’s going to happen.
Sounds like ALFA’s boohooing and blaming everyone else for Malone’s loss. Truth is, if anyone should be blamed, it should be Bentley, not the trial lawyers. I do find it interesting though that Graddick and Malone fought over the business vote and all the while Graddick was getting back-door money from the trial lawyers. Well played Charlie.
I’m just not sure how that flew under the radar if Malone’s campaign staff was worth their salt………….
Malone’s crazy if he takes the 2 year college system job. That’s just a bunch of headaches for nothing when he could go back to the bench.
As for the Millers. Not surprised. I’m just surprised it didn’t become a campaign issue. Malone’s campaign should have been watching the money trial a little closer.
Gotta love random speculation about who’s involved when the Sec State is clear on ownership of the PAC. Lobbying for AEA. You funny!
Jeff and Deborah Miller funneling money for the trial lawyers…oh sweet irony.
Irony: are you sure it’s the Millers? This sounds like something Jack Cambell and PSA would do as well.
Yes. Go to Sec. of State’s website and see details on MPAC.
PSA was probably too busy lobbying for aea at the time to funnel the trial lawyer money. Millers, PSA cut from the same cloth.